<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[CleverPeople.com: Assessment of Iran Nuclear Programs By Janes}]]></title>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/249052/assessment-of-iran-nuclear-programs-by-janes</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/249052/assessment-of-iran-nuclear-programs-by-janes" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/249052/assessment-of-iran-nuclear-programs-by-janes</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 15:20:37 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/249052/assessment-of-iran-nuclear-programs-by-janes</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Assessment of Iran Nuclear Programs By Janes]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"><strong>Janes</strong></span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> does a great analysis of the nuclear programs in <strong>Iran</strong> and their violations of the <strong>Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)</strong>. During his first term in office, <strong>Trump</strong> "tore up" the <strong>JCPOA</strong> agreement on March 8th, 2018 and reimposed the sanctions that had been lifted per the agreement. <strong>France</strong>, <strong>Germany</strong>, the <strong>UK</strong>, <strong>China</strong>, and <strong>Russia</strong> tried to maintain the agreement, but because of the "maximum pressure" <strong>sanctions</strong> by the <strong>USA Iran</strong> returned to enrichment.</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">We (and the world) would have been much better off keeping the <strong>JCPOA</strong> in place and punishing <strong>Iran</strong> for any violations. Instead, <strong>Israel</strong> and the <strong>USA</strong> carried out military strikes against <strong>Iran</strong> and <strong>Trump</strong> lied and said their program had been "obliterated." The attack did destroy part of their nuclear program, but it was far from being obliterated. Now, you have to pick which lie you want to believe: is the latest <strong>Iran</strong> war because of their nuclear program or is it to force regime change? Or is it both? <strong>Trump</strong> and <strong>Netanyahu</strong> don't really have a plan for what they're doing beyond carrying out military strikes and they don't have a plan for what comes next.</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">According to analysis by </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"><strong>Janes</strong></span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> (which I trust): <strong>Iran</strong>’s breakout time – the time required to produce weapons-grade uranium enough for one nuclear weapon – is about six to seven days. <strong>Iran</strong> can produce enough weapons-grade uranium for five to eight weapons in about one to two months. <strong>Iran </strong>is not yet known to be capable of using weapons-grade uranium to make a nuclear weapon that can be mated with a delivery platform. The process of weaponization is very likely to take a significantly longer period.</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">They also report that there is no indication that <strong>Iran</strong> is pushing ahead with the weaponization component of any process towards a nuclear weapons capability.</span></p><p>Address of the Bookmark: <a href="https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/open-source-defence-intelligence-case-studies/janes-assessment-of-iran-nuclear-programme" rel="nofollow" class="elgg-anchor"><span class="elgg-anchor-label">https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/open-source-defence-intelligence-case-studies/janes-assessment-...</span></a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Gary Wright II</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
