<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[CleverPeople.com: Strategic Air Power 101 - Bret Devereaux}]]></title>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/249051/strategic-air-power-101-bret-devereaux</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/249051/strategic-air-power-101-bret-devereaux" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/249051/strategic-air-power-101-bret-devereaux</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:49:26 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/249051/strategic-air-power-101-bret-devereaux</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Strategic Air Power 101 - Bret Devereaux]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">If anyone wants to take a deep dive into why air power alone can't replace battlefield success, here's a blog post from 2022 by <strong>Bret Devereaux</strong> that covers the entire history of <strong>strategic air power</strong>. At the time, he was focused on the <strong>Russian</strong> invasion of <strong>Ukraine</strong>, but the lessons from history apply to any war.</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">It will probably take you about an hour to read the article and all of the good comments that follow it.</span></p><p>Address of the Bookmark: <a href="https://acoup.blog/2022/10/21/collections-strategic-airpower-101/" rel="nofollow" class="elgg-anchor"><span class="elgg-anchor-label">https://acoup.blog/2022/10/21/collections-strategic-airpower-101/</span></a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Gary Wright II</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
