<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[CleverPeople.com: Naturalized Citizen Challenges DHS Airport Searches}]]></title>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148855/naturalized-citizen-challenges-dhs-airport-searches</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148855/naturalized-citizen-challenges-dhs-airport-searches" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148855/naturalized-citizen-challenges-dhs-airport-searches</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 16:54:37 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148855/naturalized-citizen-challenges-dhs-airport-searches</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Naturalized Citizen Challenges DHS Airport Searches]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">A federal lawsuit was just filed that challenges the <strong>DHS</strong> extensive airport searches <strong>without a warrant</strong>. There is a <strong>2018 directive</strong> that gives <strong>CBP</strong> agents the power to search people <strong>within a 100-miles of a border</strong>. That <strong>“border exception”</strong> affects <strong>228 million</strong> people, or <strong>two-thirds</strong> of our population.</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">These searches violate the <strong>4th Amendment</strong> which states:</span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."</span></i><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">According to the 15-page Complaint paragraph 4 (a link is in the press release linked below): </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">"Wilmer was separated from his husband and taken to an isolated secondary screening area, where he was repeatedly pressured to hand over his laptop, smartphone, and tablet, along with his passwords. When he objected, he was told he had no Fourth Amendment rights at the border. Moreover, he was told he was behaving suspiciously simply by asserting those rights and refusing to consent to the device searches. His requests to contact his family and lawyer were denied during the detention."</span></i><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">I've been waiting for one of these cases to challenge these <strong>unlawful searches</strong>, because we have to protect our <strong>4th Amendment</strong> and I don't agree that we give up our <strong>Constitutional rights</strong> just because we're near a border.</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">Here's a summary of the case by <strong>Pacific Legal Foundation</strong> who has taken the case pro bono publico (for the public good). Godspeed!</span></p><p>Address of the Bookmark: <a href="https://pacificlegal.org/case/chavarria-border-searches-fourth-amendment/" rel="nofollow" class="elgg-anchor"><span class="elgg-anchor-label">https://pacificlegal.org/case/chavarria-border-searches-fourth-amendment/</span></a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>CleverNews.Net</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
