<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[CleverPeople.com: SCOTUS To Hear Birthright Citizenship Case}]]></title>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148753/scotus-to-hear-birthright-citizenship-case</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148753/scotus-to-hear-birthright-citizenship-case" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148753/scotus-to-hear-birthright-citizenship-case</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 14:42:05 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148753/scotus-to-hear-birthright-citizenship-case</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SCOTUS To Hear Birthright Citizenship Case]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">The <strong>Supreme Court</strong> just granted certiorari to hear <strong>Trump</strong>'s plan to overturn the <strong>14th Amendment</strong> guarantee of <strong>birthright citizenship</strong>. That means that at least 4 of the 9 justices voted to hear the case, which has been ruled <strong>unconstitutional</strong> by all of the lower courts. The <strong>Questions Presented</strong> file hasn't been filled in yet, but <strong>Trump</strong> has been arguing against the text of the <strong>Constitution</strong> that says: </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”</span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> <strong>Trump</strong> claims that migrants aren't </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">"subject to the jurisdiction thereof"</span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> so babies don't get citizenship unless both parents are citizens at time of birth. Nobody has ever interpreted the law this way, so I'm shocked that <strong>SCOTUS</strong> has even agreed to hear this case.</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">If immigrants aren't </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">"subject to the jurisdiction thereof"</span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> then doesn't that mean they also wouldn't be subject to federal or state laws? <strong>Trump</strong>'s interpretation of the <strong>14th Amendment</strong> defies all logic, but here we are. What will the corrupt <strong>SCOTUS</strong> do?</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">Here's the court docket for <strong>Trump, et al. v. Barbara, et al.</strong> (<strong>SCOTUS</strong> Case #25-365).</span></p><p>Address of the Bookmark: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-365.html" rel="nofollow" class="elgg-anchor"><span class="elgg-anchor-label">https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-365.html</span></a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Gary Wright II</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
