<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[CleverPeople.com: SCOTUS Allows Racial Gerrymandering In Texas}]]></title>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148723/scotus-allows-racial-gerrymandering-in-texas</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148723/scotus-allows-racial-gerrymandering-in-texas" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148723/scotus-allows-racial-gerrymandering-in-texas</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 18:52:09 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148723/scotus-allows-racial-gerrymandering-in-texas</link>
	<title><![CDATA[SCOTUS Allows Racial Gerrymandering In Texas]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">Using the map, <strong>Texas</strong> could add up to <strong>5 more seats</strong> in the <strong>House of Representatives</strong>. <strong>Justice Kagan</strong> wrote the dissent. The unsigned order says that <strong>Texas</strong> is </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">“likely to succeed on the merits of its claim,”</span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> and that the lower court </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">“failed to honor the presumption of legislative good faith”</span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> when assessing the state legislature’s motives. The lower court ruled that the map was <strong>racially gerrymandered</strong>. It will be interesting to see if <strong>SCOTUS</strong> allows the <strong>California</strong> map. The three liberals voted no, so it looks like the vote was likely 6-3. Here's the 20-page court's opinion (the dissent starts on page 4).</span><br>&nbsp;</p><p>Address of the Bookmark: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a608_7khn.pdf" rel="nofollow" class="elgg-anchor"><span class="elgg-anchor-label">https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a608_7khn.pdf</span></a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Gary Wright II</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
