<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[CleverPeople.com: Flag-Burning Is Protected Free Speech}]]></title>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148676/flag-burning-is-protected-free-speech</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148676/flag-burning-is-protected-free-speech" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148676/flag-burning-is-protected-free-speech</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:51:29 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/148676/flag-burning-is-protected-free-speech</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Flag-Burning Is Protected Free Speech]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">When <strong>Trump</strong> issued an <strong>Executive Order</strong> that banned burning or desecrating the <strong>US flag</strong>, many people noticed the irony of him pardoning all of the <strong>January 6th insurrectionists</strong> who soiled the <strong>Capitol</strong> and assaulted police officers using <strong>flags</strong> on poles, yet wanting to imprison those who burn a flag. The <strong>Supreme Court</strong> has held multiple times that flag-burning is protected under the <strong>First Amendment</strong>.&nbsp;</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">On the day <strong>Trump</strong> signed the order, <strong>North Carolina</strong> Army combat veteran <strong>Jan Carey</strong> exercised his rights and burned a small flag on top of some bricks in <strong>Lafayette Square</strong> across from the <strong>White House</strong> in protest of the unlawful <strong>Executive Order</strong>. He announced on a bullhorn what he was doing and why.</span><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">US Attorney for DC <strong>Jeanine "Wine Box" Pirro</strong> </span><span class="x1xsqp64 xiy17q3 x1o6pynw x19co3pv xdj266r xjn30re xat24cr x1hb08if x2b8uid xexx8yu xcaqkgz x18d9i69 xbwkkl7 x3jgonx x1bhl96m" style="background-image:url(&quot;denied:https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t4e/1/16/1f644.png&quot;);background-size:16px 16px;cursor:default;white-space:pre-wrap;" data-testid="emoji">🙄</span><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> (a former <strong>Fox News</strong> host) charged <strong>Carey</strong> with two misdemeanors that each carry a penalty of up to 6 months in jail. Instead of using the <strong>Executive Order</strong> as a legal basis (which would immediately fail in court) she drummed up two other charges: </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">Count 1 is for Fire in an Undesignated Area; Count 2 is Lighting a Fire in a Manner that Causes Damage to Real Property or Park Resources.</span></i><br><br><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">In other words, they're coming up with reasons for <strong>criminal charges</strong> against people who exercise their rights. The case has been assigned to <strong>DC Federal Chief Judge James Boasberg</strong> who has yet to rule on a <strong>Motion to Dismiss</strong> the case, but has scheduled a status hearing for January 28th.</span><br><br>This bookmark is a link to <span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">that court docket.</span></p><p>Address of the Bookmark: <a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71223653/united-states-v-carey/?order_by=desc" rel="nofollow" class="elgg-anchor"><span class="elgg-anchor-label">https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71223653/united-states-v-carey/?order_by=desc</span></a></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Gary Wright II</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
