<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[CleverPeople.com: DHS Still Trying To Investigate Facebook ICE Community Watch Group}]]></title>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/blog/view/148738/dhs-still-trying-to-investigate-facebook-ice-community-watch-group</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cleverpeople.com/blog/view/148738/dhs-still-trying-to-investigate-facebook-ice-community-watch-group" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://cleverpeople.com/blog/view/148738/dhs-still-trying-to-investigate-facebook-ice-community-watch-group</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 11:13:24 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/blog/view/148738/dhs-still-trying-to-investigate-facebook-ice-community-watch-group</link>
	<title><![CDATA[DHS Still Trying To Investigate Facebook ICE Community Watch Group]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">I wrote last night about how <strong>DHS</strong> was coming after "antifa" and anyone they claim is an extremist. They recently subpoenaed <strong>Meta</strong> for information on a <strong>Facebook</strong> and <strong>Instagram</strong> community watch group that monitored the <strong>ICE</strong> activity in their area. A motion to quash the subpoena was made in federal court, but <strong>DHS</strong> isn't giving up. They don't want the content (which was made public) - they want the information they need to identify individuals, which <strong>Meta</strong> needs to be fighting to protect. It's so important that when a media company like <strong>Meta</strong> gets a subpoena, that they notify the user and give them a chance to fight back in court before they comply with it.</span><br /><br /><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"><strong>DHS</strong> in their response says: </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">"John Doe runs <strong>Facebook</strong> and <strong>Instagram</strong> accounts that have tracked <strong>United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”)</strong> agents and posted pictures and videos of agents’ faces, license plates, and weapons, among other things. The summonses do not request any information regarding the content of the accounts, which are public. However, Respondent is entitled to investigate information it received indicating that John Doe, through his social media accounts, is threatening ICE agents to impede the performance of their duties, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 115a1B. "</span></i><br /><br /><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">I'm watching this case closely, and hoping the court will quash the subpoena because these <strong>DHS</strong> threats against citizen reporting chill the <strong>freedom of speech</strong> guaranteed under the <strong>First Amendment</strong>.</span><br /><br /><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">Here's the full 16-page response that <strong>DHS</strong> filed:</span><br />https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.458146/gov.uscourts.cand.458146.28.0.pdf</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Gary Wright II</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
