<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[CleverPeople.com: Trump&#039;s DOJ Wants Segregated Schools}]]></title>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/blog/view/148612/trumps-doj-wants-segregated-schools</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cleverpeople.com/blog/view/148612/trumps-doj-wants-segregated-schools" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[}]]></description>
		<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://cleverpeople.com/blog/view/148612/trumps-doj-wants-segregated-schools</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 11:39:18 -0500</pubDate>
	<link>https://cleverpeople.com/blog/view/148612/trumps-doj-wants-segregated-schools</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Trump&#039;s DOJ Wants Segregated Schools]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">The <strong>DOJ</strong> is fighting to have civil-rights era cases dismissed in an effort to <strong>segregate</strong> the schools again. They have claimed that <strong>racism</strong> no longer exists, and so those landmark cases are no longer necessary.</span><br /><br /><a href="https://cleverpeople.com/bookmarks/view/147982/heritage-foundation"><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">The Heritage Foundation</span></a><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> wrote </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"><strong>Project 2025</strong></span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">, which the <strong>Trump</strong> administration has being using as their playbook. They have completely dismantled the <strong>Department of Education</strong> in an effort to turn the responsibility of schools back to the states. There's so many problems with that plan, not to mention the states can't afford it. Another huge problem is that many states aren't planning to offer the same <strong>civil rights protections</strong> to racial minorities and the disabled that were guaranteed by the federal government.</span><br /><br /><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">The <strong>Department of Justice</strong> is supposed to be fighting for those protections, but instead they're trying to remove them. The <strong>DOJ Civil Rights Division</strong>'s new focus falls into three main areas: gun rights, religious freedom rights, and investigating the persecution of White people. The last two areas are closely related, because they are promoting <strong>Christian Nationalism</strong>, which is a racist and perverted interpretation of religion.</span><br /><br /><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">The latest <strong>DOJ</strong> legal moves have been focused on the <strong>State of Louisiana</strong>, where state officials have been trying to overturn those old civil rights cases. Instead of <strong>DOJ</strong> fighting to preserve the hard-earned protections, they are now fighting to remove them by claiming they are a federal intrusion into local school decisions. Dozens of those cases are still open or still have effective orders because the states have never fully accomplished <strong>de-segregation</strong>.</span><br /><br /><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">The <strong>DOJ</strong> lifted a 1966 order in <strong>Louisiana</strong>'s <strong>Plaquemines Parish</strong> school district, and now they're trying to dismiss a 1965 case against the <strong>Concordia Parish</strong> school system in central <strong>Louisiana</strong> that was filed by Black families who were trying to gain access to the all-white school system.</span><br /><br /><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">Since the two (normally) opposing parties of the state and federal government are agreeing to have the case dismissed, that's usually what would have happened. Thankfully, <strong>Federal District Judge Dee Drell</strong> has rejected that idea. The judge wrote: </span><i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">“At the heart of this case is public policy and the protection of others, and the court has been tasked with ensuring the resolution of this matter in accordance with long established legal precedent."</span></i><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;"> <strong>Judge Drell</strong> offered <strong>Concordia Parish</strong> a hearing to prove it has fully dismantled the state-sponsored racial <strong>segregation</strong>. On Tuesday, they appealed that order.</span><br /><br /><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">I can't believe that decades later, we are still having to re-fight these same battles. But here we are... Here's the court docket for <strong>Smith v. Concordia Parish</strong> (Case #1:65-cv-11577) that started in 1965 and is still ongoing:</span><br /><a class="x1fey0fg xmper1u x1edh9d7" href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6105774/smith-v-concordia-parish/?order_by=desc"><span style="white-space:pre-wrap;">https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6105774/smith-v-concordia-parish/?order_by=desc</span></a><br />&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Gary Wright II</dc:creator>		</item>
</channel>
</rss>
